CFP: Transgressive Spaces in Classical Antiquity (APA Panel)

Seen on various lists:

Transgressive Spaces in Classical Antiquity Lambda Classical Caucus

Panel, APA Seattle (2013)

Organizers:
Sarah Levin-Richardson, Rice University (slr AT rice.edu)
Lauri Reitzammer, University of Colorado at Boulder
(reitzammer AT colorado.edu)

What spaces in Greek and Roman antiquity were used for gender and sexual transgression? By what means were everyday spaces transformed into places that welcomed going beyond or challenging normative gender and sexual expectations, and violating gender and sexual boundaries considered fixed and non-negotiable? Is there a spatial topography for individuals who embody non-normative gender roles or sexual practices? In what ways could "deviant" spaces affect or "infect" daily life?

Dramatic spaces in Athens permitted the audience to step beyond the
constraints of reality into a realm where, for example, women could stop
a war by means of a sex-strike, or where male viewers could temporarily
feel emotions not commonly allowed. The wilds of Mt. Cithaeron, at least
as imagined by classical Athenians, encouraged ecstatic or enthused
participants to cross out of the constraints imposed by the human
sphere. The Roman amphitheater lauded male gladiators whose wounds
violated norms of impenetrable masculinity, and the triumphal route
found soldiers calling attention to the non-normative sexual deeds of
their generals.

This panel explores the roles of space-including ritual space, dramatic
space, landscapes, and architectural space-in gender and sexual
transgressions. This focus on spatial aspects is intended to bring the
analysis of transgression into the realm of lived experience, and to
investigate the influence of built and natural environments on daily
life and cultural practices.

We welcome papers that draw on various approaches, including literary,
socio-cultural, archaeological, art-historical, and theoretical. Please
send abstracts that follow the APA’s guidelines for individual abstracts
(http://apaclassics.org/index.php/annual_meeting/program_guide_details/t
ypes_of_submissions_and_related_instructions/) by email to Prof.
Deborah Kamen (dkamen AT uw.edu), not to the panel organizers, by February 1, 2012. Please do not identify yourself anywhere in the abstract, as submissions will be blind refereed.

Mick and St Augustine?

Interesting item from the Boston College Chronicle:

What does the music of the Rolling Stones have in common with St. Augustine’s notions of evil?

Plenty, say Carroll School of Management junior Michael Barilli and Stephanie St. Martin ’07, MA ’10, who teamed up to write a chapter analyzing the famed Stones’ hit, “Sympathy for the Devil,” that will be included in a recently published book, The Rolling Stones and Philosophy: It’s Just a Thought Away.

Barilli, a music aficionado who plays the drums and was a member of several local rock bands on Long Island, NY, was a freshman in Adjunct Associate Professor Brian Braman’s Perspectives class two years ago when he met St. Martin, holder of the University’s Bernard Lonergan, SJ, Scholarship for graduate study in philosophy and a teaching assistant for Braman.

Barilli had assisted in the compilation of a song list for a class project on music and philosophy, and when St. Martin received a call for papers for the proposed philosophy book on the meaning of the famed rock group’s lyrics, she engaged the multi-talented undergraduate as co-author.

“Basically, ‘Sympathy for the Devil’ is St. Augustine’s notion of evil juxtaposed over the song,” Barilli explains. “He talks a lot about how the devil is not always there for all human atrocities — so it’s saying ‘Who is to blame here? Is it mankind or is it the devil?’ It was pretty interesting. A lot of people who take Perspectives may be a little skeptical about practical applications of philosophy. Music is a good way to get people to realize that it is still relevant.”

St. Martin, currently teaching a philosophy course at Middlesex Community College, says, “The amount of work that Michael did on this was just tremendous. He even thought of including some Socrates at the end of the chapter. In ‘Apologies,’ Socrates makes charges of not believing in God, corrupting youth and becoming sophists – people who argue for the sake of arguing, but have no real point. That is eerily similar to what the Stones are saying. I thought it was a stroke of genius for Michael to include that.”

… hmmm, I thought I had something else ‘classical’ about Keith Richards posted somewhere, but it’s not turning up. Stay tuned …

AAiR Symposium on Cultural Heritage in Danger

This one’s been sitting in my box for a couple of days … from the Plain Dealer:

The images of ancient Roman mosaics found and preserved recently in south central Turkey were stunning.

Unfortunately, they flashed across the screen in a darkened auditorium at the American Academy in Rome too quickly. One had the impulse to shout at the lecturer, “slow down!”

But the two-day symposium last month on “Saving Cultural Heritage in Crisis Areas” was running late, and Italian archaeologist Roberto Nardi had a lot of ground to cover in his dramatic tale of rescuing the mosaics from the rising waters of a lake created by the Birecik hydro-electric dam along the Euprhates River.

The American Academy conference — part of which I attended during a recent trip —showed how cultural treasures around the world are threatened by war, natural disasters, infrastructure projects such as the dam in Turkey, and the looting of sites around the world.

The conference also illuminated the evolving moral and political climate affecting art museums that buy antiquities, including the Cleveland Museum of Art.

Archaeologists have long held that when museums buy antiquities in the art market or accept gifts from collectors who do, they tacitly encourage looting, which destroys the physical context in which the objects are found and obscures a good part of their meaning.

Museums, on the other hand, insist that antiquities offered for sale on the market belong in public collections where they can be studied and appreciated, absent clear evidence that their purchase violates international laws and agreements, such as the 1970 UNESCO Convention aimed at halting illegal traffic in antiquities.

“Our communities are fighting each other non-stop and not making any progress,” said Brian Rose, who co-organized the conference in Rome.

Rose, a professor of archaeology at the University of Pennsylvania, a past president of the Archaeological Institute of America and a trustee of the American Academy in Rome, said in an interview after the conference that he’d like to see greater cooperation among museums and archaeologists. But he also said he felt the era in which American museums can collect antiquities is coming to a close.

Source countries are becoming more aggressive in pursuing traffickers and enforcing laws against looting, he said. Buying antiquities could alienate foreign governments and prevent the cooperation necessary for international loans of individual objects or traveling exhibitions.

“You’ll end up in litigation, and you won’t be able to enter into collaborative projects,” he said. “It’s all about collaboration now.”

Rather than collect, museums ought to forge agreements with source countries to share cultural riches, Rose said.

In response, C. Griffith Mann, the Cleveland museum’s chief curator, said last week that the museum would continue to buy antiquities “because we’re a collecting institution.”

Nevertheless, Mann acknowledged that the “burden of proof is on the museum to do the research to be confident that by collecting, you’re preserving art, not supporting an antiquities market that’s illicit.”

The museum’s website does not include information on the provenance, or ownership history, of most works in its collection. In the case of antiquities, this makes it impossible for the public to know how much the museum knows about where and when the objects were said to have been found. Mann said the museum’s policies on the issue are under review.

The conference in Rome documented global crises which make it likely that antiquities with unclear ownership histories will continue to tempt museums and pose painful moral questions for art audiences everywhere, including Cleveland.

Often, traffic in looted cultural treasures parallels trade in illegal drugs, guns and sex slaves, speakers at the conference said.

Advanced technology aids both the thieves and the archaeologists — the offense and the defense. Archaeologists are using satellite photographs, to pinpoint illegal excavations. At the same time, looters are gaining access to ever-more sophisticated gadgets, such as ground penetrating radar or magnetic resonance imaging equipment, which can help them spot where to dig, Rose said.

Rose, who co-organized the conference with Laurie Rush, an archaeologist for the U.S. Army at Fort Drum, N.Y., said he was motivated to convene the gathering as a response to the revolutions of the Arab Spring, and the threat they pose to world heritage sites.

The conference documented heartbreaking losses, such as the destruction of an historic bridge at Mostar in 1992 by the Yugoslav Peoples Army, and the demolition of the monumental Buddhist statues at Bamiyan, Afghanistan by Taliban forces in 2001.

Speakers also celebrated successes, such as the preservation of the ancient Roman ruins of Leptis Magna in Libya, spared from damage in the recent NATO bombing raids that helped overthrow Muammar Gaddafi.

Rose said that source countries should train soldiers to preserve cultural sites during wars and revolutions and instill pride over patrimony by educating children about national heritage.

Yet he also lamented how hard it can be today for countries rich in archaeological sites to police their own territories. In Turkey, Rose said, it is widely known that thieves use road building equipment at night to smash open stone chambers in ancient burial mounds and to remove treasures buried for centuries. Turkey simply can’t prevent the activity, he said.

Nardi, the Italian archaeologist who led the rescue of the mosaics at Zeugma, described another serious challenge: that of raising the money needed to preserve antiquities.

He said it was clear for years in advance that the rising floodwaters along the Euprhates would inundate a large portion of the ancient Roman garrison town of Zeugma. But it wasn’t until The New York Times published an article in 2000, that the impending crisis caught the attention of the Packard Humanities Institute in California, which donated $5 million to save the mosaics.

“You need journalists to wake up public opinion,” he said.

Nardi, who heads a private restoration company in Rome called the Centro di Conservazione Archaeologica, led the rescue operation at Zeugma. In his video presentation, he showed how skilled workers peeled mosaics off their ancient foundations and remounted them in sections on lightweight aluminum panels.

The mosaics are now housed in a $50 million museum that opened during the summer in the city of Gaziantep, 50 kilometers away from Zeugma. The city hopes to boost tourism and the local economy on the strength of the mosaics.

The collection includes clear evidence of looting at Zeugma prior to 2000, including a mosaic double portrait of Metiochos and Parthenope, fictional lovers described as the Romeo and Juliet of the ancient world.

Archaeological journals reported in 1999 that the two central figures in the mosaic surfaced at Rice University in Houston, where they had been loaned by the Menil Collection. The mosaics were later returned to Turkey, where Nardi reassembled them.

It was one vivid example of how institutions and collectors in the U.S., even with the best of intentions, can sometimes participate unwittingly in the ongoing destruction of cultural sites around the world.

… and it’s just scratching the surface …