d.m. Edith Kovach

From the Detroit Free Press:

Thousands of Latin students around the country learned the language from the voice of someone they never met: former educator Edith Kovach.

Her enthusiasm and dedication in her Latin and Greek teachings endeared her in the hearts and minds of students and faculty alike.

A onetime chairwoman of the University of Detroit’s classical studies department and a longtime instructor in the Detroit Public Schools, Ms. Kovach died Wednesday of cardiac arrest in her Bloomfield Hills home. She was 88.

“Without a doubt, teaching was her passion and knowledge was the reward,” said her longtime friend, Alice McIntyre. “She had a marvelous ability for bringing all classic arts and languages together so that people developed a depth of understanding and a genuine appreciation.”

Ms. Kovach was a nationally recognized figure in the development of methods to teach Latin and Greek at both the high school and college levels, and conducted frequent summer workshops and seminars at college campuses around the country.

Fluent in Spanish and German, she was instrumental in the improvement of the drill tapes and tests she helped develop for Macmillan & Co. to accompany Latin textbooks. As a result, her voice became a familiar learning tool for students around the country.

Born in New York City, she graduated from Central High School in Detroit and received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Latin and foreign language education, respectively, from Wayne State University. She received her PhD in classical studies and Latin from the University of Michigan.

Ms. Kovach began her career as a language and math teacher in the Detroit Public Schools. She taught for more than 20 years and chaired the foreign language department at Mumford High School.

After going to work at what was then the University of Detroit in 1965, she was responsible for many improvements within the department. She was awarded the school’s President’s Award for Excellence in Teaching in 1984 — the first woman to be so honored.

Survivors include her brother, Eugene Kovach, and several nieces and nephews.

CFP: Family As Strategy =10th Unisa Classics Colloquium

… seen on the Classicists list

SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS: 10TH UNISA CLASSICS COLLOQUIUM

University of South Africa, Pretoria

THEME: ‘Family as Strategy in the Roman Empire’

DATE: October 15 – 17, 2009

Papers are hereby invited on any aspect of the family in Greco-Roman
antiquity and early Christianity that may be seen to further illuminate
the conference topic. The approach of this conference seeks to emphasize
that family, house and household were contextualised within the social and
power relations of the time (see abstract below). Apart from literary
investigations, we would like to encourage contributions with an
historical or archaeological concern. Enquiries regarding theoretical and
methodological issues, such as the interaction between literary and
material evidence, the design of interpretive strategies and the
fabrication of a socio-historiography are also welcomed.

This year’s colloquium is a collaborative effort by Classics and New
Testament & Early Christian Studies at the University of South Africa and
aims at fostering interdisciplinary perspectives.

Abstracts and submission date
Please submit abstracts of appr. 200 words via e-mail attachment to
Olympus AT yebo.co.za or bosmapr AT unisa.ac.za by the end of July/beginning of
August 2009.

More on the conference

The Unisa Classics Colloquium is a pleasant and intimate conference in a
relaxed atmosphere with ample opportunity for discussion. Over two and a
half days, appr. 20 papers from scholars around the world are presented.We
try to avoid parallel sessions to promote unity and focus in the
conference, and delegates get to know one another properly. We also try to
show guests from abroad a little of the country during the conference.

Venue

The colloquium takes place at the University of South Africa (UNISA) in
Pretoria, capital of the Republic of South Africa. Among other
attractions, Pretoria is famous for its Jacaranda trees, which are in full
bloom at the time of our colloquium
(http://www.southafrica.info/travel/cities/pretoria.htm)

Programme

We start on Thursday morning the 15th and end at lunch time on Saturday
the 17th of October. This means that you should preferably book your
flight to arrive on the 14th at the latest. You may book your ticket out
for Saturday evening, but that might have cost implications (staying for a
Saturday night often reduces the ticket price considerably) and you will
lose out on the Pilanesberg outing (ses below).

A preliminary programme will be compiled from the received proposals and
will be published after the final date for submissions at
http://www.unisa.ac.za/Default.asp?Cmd=ViewContent&ContentID=18743

Conference Fee

The conference fee will be $150 for overseas visitors, inclusive of
transport (from and to the airport and during the conference) and meals
during the conference. You may work on an exchange rate of roughly ZAR
8.00/$, ZAR 13.50/£ or ZAR12/EUR.

Postgraduates, other students and interested parties not able to claim
their conference fees back from their institutions should please contact
the organisers for a discount.

Accommodation

We will provide more information on accommodation in due course. Pretoria
offers a variety in this regard. During past conferences, guests stayed at
the Brooklyn Guest Houses (http://www.brooklynguesthouses.co.za/) situated
in a safe and attractive neighbourhood close to Unisa, the University of
Pretoria, and the Brooklyn and Hatfield shopping centres.

Excursions

We plan a trip for Sunday 18 October to the Pilanesberg Game Reserve, 1½
hours drive west of Pretoria where the Big Five may be seen (if we are
lucky) in their natural habitat. Transport will be provided.

Depending on interest, a visit to Cape Town as a group is a distinct
possibility.

Possible publication

Depending on the quality of submissions, the colloquium papers may be
published in an edited volume on the theme. Submitted papers are subject
to a refereeing process. If you would consider submitting your paper to be
published, please indicate that to us via return mail for further
guidelines on style.

Abstract on the conference theme

The last few decades witnessed an explosion of studies on a multitude of
aspects concerning the family in Greco-Roman antiquity. This conference
wishes to contribute to the ongoing debate by exploring the specific ways
in which the family was used as a strategy for a variety of social
purposes. On the one hand, the family was generated by political,
economic, cultural and moral forces. On the other hand, it functioned
reciprocally to cultivate, reinforce and sustain the very practices from
which it emerged.

The family may be interrogated in terms of its various dimensions; for
instance, as a social site occupying space. It may be asked how the
individual’s place was determined in interaction with his or her family?
How was the family, in terms of cultural discourses, strategically
utilised as microcosm within a particular macrocosm? Exactly what was
public and what was private in the workings of the Graeco-Roman family and
how rigid was this distinction? How was the family determined by and—in
its turn—fashioned material sites and cultural products: household
architecture, art, decoration, utensils, and the like? The family may also
be investigated in terms of its temporal dimension, such as its legacies
from pre-colonial times, its role in Romanization and the ideal of
Romanitas, as a nucleus of identity, cooption, and resistance.
Furthermore, Early Christianity emerged as part and parcel of this complex
discursive world and structured itself in continuity (e.g. patriarchy),
but also deviated from the model in significant ways, for instance in how
desire and gender was regulated within the structures of family life, and
in its cultivation of movements such as asceticism and monasticism. How
was the dominant family discourse appropriated by early Christianity and
to what extent did the family as a form of strategy cooperate in the
Christianization of the Roman Empire?

Finally, papers concerned with appeals to either the continuity or
discontinuity of the family formed in the Roman Empire will also be
considered.

CONF: Irony and the Ironic in Classical Literature

… seen on the Classicists list:

IRONY AND THE IRONIC IN CLASSICAL LITERATURE

A conference at the University of Exeter

1-4 September 2009

Booking is now open for this exciting conference. For more details, including registration forms, costs and a full conference programme, visit http://huss.exeter.ac.uk/classics/conferences or contact either of the conference organizers, Dr Matthew Wright (M.Wright AT exeter.ac.uk) and Dr Karen Ní Mheallaigh (K.Ni-Mheallaigh AT exeter.ac.uk). The final date for booking is MONDAY 27 JULY.

Speakers and topics:

* Eran Almagor (Hebrew University of Jerusalem): ‘Irony and the Unreliable Narrator in Plutarch’s Lives’

* Sarah Bolmarcich (University of Minnesota, Twin Cities): ‘Didactic irony in Thucydides’

* James Brusuelas (University of California, Irvine): ‘An ironic continuum: ancient and modern ironic discourse in Lucian’s Nekyomanteia’

* David Engels (Université Libre de Bruxelles): ‘Irony and Plato’s Menexenus’

* Philip Etherington (King’s College, London): ‘Levels of understanding in Philostratus’ Imagines’

* Vivienne Gray (University of Auckland): ‘The ironical Xenophon’

* Joseph Howley (University of St Andrews): ‘Irony and miscellany: the table of contents of the Noctes Atticae’

* Domenico Lembo (Università "Federico II" di Napoli): ‘Between eironeia and irony’

* Marko Marinčič (University of Ljubljana): ‘Irony and Alexandrianism’

* Damien Nelis (Université de Genève): ‘Irony in Catullus 64’

* Karen Ní Mheallaigh (University of Exeter): ‘Irony and narrative.’

* Dennis Pausch (University of Giessen): ‘Instruction or entertainment? Livy narrates the reign of Romulus’

* Ian Ruffell (University of Glasgow): ‘Character, plot or stance? Irony in ancient comic theory and practice’

* Marios Skempis (University of Basel): ‘Ironic Demarcation: Declaring Lyric Identity in Bacchylides 17’

* Isabelle Torrance (Notre Dame University, Indiana): ‘Intertextual irony in Euripides: who got it?’

* Catherine Ware (National University of Ireland, Maynooth): ‘Claudian’s Praise of the Emperor Honorius’

* Michael Stuart Williams (National University of Ireland, Maynooth): ‘Empsonian Irony in Augustinian Africa’

* Matthew Wright (University of Exeter): ‘The birth of irony’

This Day in Ancient History

nonae iuliae

  • ludi Apollinares (day 2)– games instituted in 212 B.C. after consulting the Sybilline books during a particularly bad stretch in the Punic Wars; four years later they became an annual festival in honour of Apollo
  • feriae Ancillarum — a festival in honour of the “maids” who helped save Rome from a Latin attack in the days after the Gallic sack
  • rites in honour of Juno Caprotina — rites possibly associated with the above in which Latin women offered sacrifices to Juno Caprotina under wild fig trees (the branches of the tree were also somehow used … the old canard of ‘fertility ritual’ is usually mentioned in this context)
  • rites in honour of Consus in the Circus Maximus — ‘public priests’ offered a sacrifice to Consus (possibly in a role of presiding over grain which has been stored underground) at his underground altar (was it uncovered for this?) at the first turning point in the Circus
  • eighth century B.C.? — death/disappearance of Romulus (traditional, obviously)
  • 267 B.C. — dedication of the Temple of Pales (and associated rites thereafter)
  • 175 A.D. — the future emperor Commodus dons his toga virilis
  • c. 200 A.D. — martyrdom of Pantaenus (a Stoic!)
  • 1586 — birth of Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel (amasser of the Arundelian Marbles)

Michael Sightings

I’m killing time while the wife and kids watch the Bachelorette (gag), and have been posting assorted things on my Facebook page about claims that Michael Jackson is actually alive. Also on my Facebook page I’ve posted links to assorted Weekly World News covers suggesting the same thing about Elvis (and Princess Di). What I’ve always found interesting (ever since Elvis died and this phenomenon seemed to have started) is that the same thing happened shortly after Nero died so I might as well write some sort of blog post on this. We begin with what Tacitus relates in Histories 2.9:

About this time Achaia and Asia Minor were terrified by a false report that Nero was at hand. Various rumours were current about his death; and so there were many who pretended and believed that he was still alive. The adventures and enterprises of the other pretenders I shall relate in the regular course of my work. The pretender in this case was a slave from Pontus, or, according to some accounts, a freedman from Italy, a skilful harp-player and singer, accomplishments, which, added to a resemblance in the face, gave a very deceptive plausibility to his pretensions. After attaching to himself some deserters, needy vagrants whom he bribed with great offers, he put to sea. Driven by stress of weather to the island of Cythnus, he induced certain soldiers, who were on their way from the East, to join him, and ordered others, who refused, to be executed. He also robbed the traders and armed all the most able bodied of the slaves. The centurion Sisenna, who was the bearer of the clasped right hands, the usual emblems of friendship, from the armies of Syria to the Praetorians, was assailed by him with various artifices, till he left the island secretly, and, fearing actual violence, made his escape with all haste. Thence the alarm spread far and wide, and many roused themselves at the well-known name, eager for change, and detesting the present state of things. The report was daily gaining credit when an accident put an end to it.

Galba had entrusted the government of Galatia and Pamphylia to Calpurnius Asprenas. Two triremes from the fleet of Misenum were given him to pursue the adventurer: with these he reached the island of Cythnus. Persons were found to summon the captains in the name of Nero. The pretender himself, assuming a studied appearance of sorrow, and appealing to their fidelity as old soldiers of his own, besought them to land him in Egypt or Syria. The captains, perhaps wavering, perhaps intending to deceive, declared that they must address their soldiers, and that they would return when the minds of all had been prepared. Everything, however, was faithfully reported to Asprenas, and at his bidding the ship was boarded and taken, and the man, whoever he was, killed. The body, in which the eyes, the hair, and the savage countenance, were remarkable features, was conveyed to Asia, and thence to Rome. The Histories via the Internet Classics Archive

But it didn’t end there … Cassius Dio relates another false Nero during the principate of Titus:

In his reign also the False Nero appeared, who was an Asiatic named Terentius Maximus. He resembled Nero both in appearance and in voice (for he too sang to the accompaniment of the lyre). He gained a few followers in Asia, and in his advance to the Euphrates attached a far greater number, and finally sought refuge with Artabanus, the Parthian leader, who, because of his anger against Titus, both received him and set about making preparations to restore him to Rome. (Epitome of Book 66 via Lacus Curtius)

… and there was (perhaps) a third False Nero, mentioned in the last chapter of Suetonius’ Nero:

He met his death in the thirty-second year of his age, on the anniversary of the murder of Octavia, and such was the public rejoicing that the people put on liberty-caps160 and ran about all over the city. Yet there were some who for a long time decorated his tomb with spring and summer flowers, and now produced his statues on the rostra in the fringed toga, and now his edicts, as if he were still alive and would shortly return and deal destruction to his enemies. Nay more, Vologaesus, king of the Parthians, when he sent envoys to the senate to renew his alliance, earnestly begged this too, that honour be paid to the memory of Nero. In fact, twenty years later, when I was a young man, a person of obscure origin appeared, who gave out that he was Nero, and the name was still in such favour with the Parthians that they supported him vigorously and surrendered him with great reluctance. (via Lacus Curtius)

Tacitus, in the beginning of his Histories (1.2.1) mentions:

I am entering on the history of a period rich in disasters, frightful in its wars, torn by civil strife, and even in peace full of horrors. Four emperors perished by the sword. There were three civil wars; there were more with foreign enemies; there were often wars that had both characters at once. There was success in the East, and disaster in the West. There were disturbances in Illyricum; Gaul wavered in its allegiance; Britain was thoroughly subdued and immediately abandoned; the tribes of the Suevi and the Sarmatae rose in concert against us; the Dacians had the glory of inflicting as well as suffering defeat; the armies of Parthia were all but set in motion by the cheat of a counterfeit Nero. (Internet Classics Archive)

… this is usually assumed to be one of the aforementioned. The usual study of all these ‘sightings’ is Christopher Tuplin, ‘The False Neros of the First Century AD’, in C. Deroux (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History (Collection Latomus, 206; Brussels: Latomus): 364-404.

The parallel is not exact, of course — the above situations seem to involve actual persons impersonating Ner0  (but we have that phenomenon too) . But in at least one, of course, we’re in the realm of rumours and the implication is there might even have been more ‘sightings’. Whatever the case, it’s an interesting, and  rather ancient phenomenon …

UPDATE (07/09/09) ~ rogueclassicism/Explorator reader Angelika Franz has written an interesting item on this ‘sightings’ phenomenon in modern and ancient times for Spiegel (in German):