Alexander Medallion

Interesting item from the Sunday Times (Sri Lanka):

Embossed on the gold coin is the arrogant profile of Alexander the Great. On it, the young conqueror’s features endure: his luxuriant curly hair and the crooked line of his broken nose; his elongated cheeks and large, unblinking eyes. Curiously though, his head is covered in the scalp of an elephant, its trunk curling triumphantly over his brow. Around his neck is the image of the Gorgon, the coiling snakes worn as an aegis. The horn of Ammon protects his temple. The striking image is valued for far more than its obvious beauty. It is believed to be the only portrait actually created during the lifetime of Alexander the Great to survive into modernity. This is Alexander as he saw himself – invulnerable, verging on godhood, immortalized in the moment of his triumph.

“It’s exactly Alexander, there is no doubt about that,” says Sri Lankan numismatist Prof. Osmund Bopearachchi. Having announced the find to the world, more recently Osmund co-authored a book with History professor Frank Holt which was published just last month titled ‘The Alexander Medallion: Exploring the Origins of a Unique Artefact’. Written partly in defence of the authenticity of the gold medallion, the book describes the extraordinary circumstances that led to the unveiling of the priceless artefact. Its historical significance far outweighing the value of the precious metal itself, its history is both the subject of the book and of Osmund’s long obsession.

At the centre of the story is a humble village in Afghanistan. Located in one of the most hostile political and geographical landscapes on earth, Mir Zakah lies along the ancient trail that connects Ghazni in modern Afghanistan to Gandhara in what is now Pakistan. Travelling in the company of a French journalist and 12 bodyguards, Osmund made his way there in 2004. As the temperature plummeted to minus 15 degrees centigrade outside, the men covered themselves with carpets to keep warm and brushed their teeth with snow. Despite the abject poverty that surrounded them, in the evenings the numismatist would show his hosts pictures of incredible treasures – of gold, silver and bronze ornaments, vessels and coins – and ask them whether there were any among them they recognized.
The pieces he was showing them were in the possession of a Japanese museum.

The museum had been sold the pieces which had been deliberately misrepresented by corrupt agents as belonging to another set known as the Oxus treasure . Now, Osmund was unsurprised to discover the men had in fact seen many of the pieces before. After all, some of them had actually handled the objects themselves, pulling each piece fresh from the earth just a few feet away from where they now huddled together. Some shared their keepsakes with the visitors – on the palm of his hand, one man displayed a single diminutive gold coin. Unbeknownst to the Afghan farmer, the Indo-Scythian coin with the image of Azes stamped onto its face was a rarity, worth an estimated $20,000. Yet, this was only one of Mir Zakah’s treasures – and there are hundreds of thousands more.

The Mir Zakah deposit is believed to contain roughly 550,000 coins alongside hundreds of other, larger objects. “When you look at the composition you get everything – from North India to Southern Uzbekistan and North Afghanistan,” says Osmund explaining that the pieces are equally diverse in their chronology, with some of the earliest dating to the 5th century B.C going up to the 2nd century A.D. How they came to be tossed together in the same well remains a matter of speculation. Osmund himself imagines a scenario where an army of Sassanians successfully plundered the treasuries and collections of temples and cities but was then faced with a sudden challenge from a rival group. They would have been forced to ditch their loot before going to battle. If so, clearly they lost and their treasure was left to languish unclaimed for centuries.

When some of it resurfaced centuries later, many pieces would be routed through the bazaars of the Pakistani city of Peshawar, before they were smuggled out to America and Europe. The first coins appeared in the late 1940s and 50s, just after the hoard at Mir Zakah was first excavated. Intervening in 1948, French archaeologists attempted to collect and study some of the deposit’s treasures, but political disturbances and violence in the region forced them to give up their hunt well before the hoard was exhausted. It would lie relatively undisturbed till a group of ambitious looters would dig up the well again in 1993 – 94. Again, they would leave the job half done. Violence and multiple deaths among those involved with the illicit dig would earn the Mir Zakah hoard a reputation for being cursed among locals. Soon the site would become altogether inaccessible to outsiders, as Afghanistan entered a prolonged period of unrest.

Still, what was dug up was enough to flood the markets of Peshawar with astounding quantities of artefacts and coins in particular. It was here that Osmund first encountered the treasures of Mir Zakah in person. Osmund remembers being entirely overwhelmed as sack after sack, each filled with approximately 50 kgs of coins, were poured over the floor before him. It was quite literally a ‘pluie’ or a ‘rain’ of coins, says Osmund, adding, “I suspect that no numismatist has ever seen so many coins in such a short space of time.” Determined to get a handle on the composition of the hoard, he began what he describes as a desperate exercise. “I began to sort the coins into groups according to the issuers, e.g. early Indian, Greek city states, Seleucids, Indo-Greeks, Indo-Scythians, Indo-Parthians, and Kushans.”

It was an impossible exercise, as was the authorities’ every attempt to confiscate or buy the loot of Mir Zakah – even as you read this, a known stash of three tons of valuable coins in Basel, Switzerland remains tantalisingly inaccessible to scholars. Instead wily smugglers have succeeded in ushering priceless artefacts into museums and private collections all over the world – not hesitating to create fictitious histories for their antiques if required. Alexander’s commemorative medallion would find its way to London and into the hands of an anonymous collector who has no intention of parting with it, though he has allowed it to be exhibited.

For those familiar with coins from Ptolemy I’s reign, the portrait of Alexander is not an uncommon one. Though the work is particularly fine, it could have arguably come out of a workshop in Egypt. However, the one obstacle to this interpretation is quite literally of elephantine proportions. On the back of the coin, where you might have to expected to find Athena brandishing a spear, you see instead an elephant walking on tiptoe. Issued in 326 BC to commemorate Alexander’s resounding defeat of Porus, the King of Paurava by the river Jhelum in what is modern Punjab, the coin was intended to be a golden boast. It is a find that excited Osmund – he calls it “the missing link” that explained the baffling appearance of an Asian elephant on coins minted in countries where there were none about. It represented the attempts of other, later rulers to share in Alexander’s glory.

Other silver coins issued around the period flesh out the action of the battle. In one, Alexander, astride a horse, flings a spear at Porus on his elephant. In another, the King’s men ride in four-horse chariots as they draw their awesome bows. These coins are evidence, that where historical records fail, where stories are forgotten, coins remain to tell the tale.

As for Osmund, the Alexander medallion is only a highlight in a very distinguished career. Reportedly, the only Sri Lankan numismatist to have a PhD in the subject, Osmund graduated with a B.A from the University of Kelaniya and has spent the last three decades in France where he is the Director of Research at the French National Centre for Scientific Research. Specializing in the coinage of the Indo-Greek and Greco-Bactrian kingdoms, he has catalogued numerous collections of coins, including one for the Smithsonian. A professor of Central Asian and South Asian archaeology and art history at the University Paris-Sorbonne, he is currently a visiting Professor at the University of Berkeley in California. He is also the author of nine books, the most recent being ‘The Pleasure Gardens of Sigiriya. A New Approach’. Among others, he has been honoured with the Gustave Mendel Award, The Lhotka Memorial Prize and the Order of Constantine the Great.

In Sri Lanka, he is currently engaged in a search for the traces of an ancient sea port and settlement in Kuchchiveli in the Trincomalee district, but says that while he intends to juggle many projects, the coins from Mir Zakah continue to fascinate him. “From 1983 (when he was writing his PhD dissertation) until today, coins from both Mir Zakah deposits have been part and parcel of my life,” says Osmund. There is much left to be done: the dig is incomplete and what has been already excavated is very poorly documented.

“As long as all the artefacts and coins dispersed in private collections are not made known to the world and the three tons of coins still lying in the Free Trade Zone of Basel are not exposed and studied, the story of Mir Zakah will remain untold,” he says.

I can’t recall much about this Mir Zakah deposit, although I believe I one point I linked to an article in Saudi Aramco World entitled Ptolemy’s Alexandrian Postscript, which does go into it a bit. Also worth a look is a review in ANS Magazine: Le Portrait d’Alexandre le Grand: Histoire d’une découverte pour l’humanité (the review is in English).

4 thoughts on “Alexander Medallion

  1. It is a forgery as I explained in the Celator, vol 21, No 9 Sept 2007. It imitates the second style of Ptolemy’s tetradrachms as Satrap. It is implausible (to say the least) that Ptolemy would have invented a new style of this Alexander in an elephant headdress for his first issue, then reverted to a style first issued under Alexander a few years later for his second issue. More likely an ignorant forger has copied the common second style tetradrachms of Ptolemy, without realising that the existence of the rare first issue exposes the fraud.

  2. It is just as easy to explain things away as forgeries when they don’t fit the established view as it is to distort history with forgeries. Let’s wait for the new book by Bopearachchi and Holt before we write this off as a forgery.

  3. This is the real story/facts regarding the existence of MirzaKah hoard and the Alexander Medallion and some other rare coins. This hoard was found in the early 1990s in Afghanistan inmthe province of Paktiya. The treasure contained more than 100 kg of gold and silver objects and more than 3 tons of copper, silver and gold coins of many dynasties such as Greek, Bactrian, Parthian, Seythian, Kushans and so on! The latest coin I observed in the hoard was of Huns of Mihirakula.

    As the treasure belonged to whole community of that tribal village, certain people are still keeping lot of materials as souvenirs and some of the material was also sold in markets on metal value. Thanks to some good people who preserved the material in private collection, otherwise everything would have been melted due to Afghan war.

    I believe a major part of the hoard is still owned by the Afghans in the said areas. Many collectors also had a chance to study in local markets high quality specimens from this treasure including A late architect of Afghanistan who purchased most of the coins and preserved. A number of persons including foreigners had been visiting Peshawar in early 90s to buy the whole treasure, but they failed, I am sure.

    I and my other local colleagues went through some available part of this hoard and made lot of new discoveries. We saw a group of gold coins from Mirzakah which
    was brought by some tribal man in the market. Unknowingly he sold this group in the local markets.

    In this group there was a Porus type tetradracham and there we also saw the Gold coin of Alexander for the first time. We immediately realized from the appearance of the coin we knew that it was struck locally in his life time during his conquest to India (Jhelum/Taxila). We all knew that coins of Alexander had been very popular in the then know world and had been minted for over four hundred years also even after his death and were used as trade coins during that time. The portrait on that gold coin was some different to the one we knew from Greek/Syria. We observed that this could be due to the fact as Alexander the Great had been at war for many years and it could be the real face as he was in Asia facing lot of troubles during war. Morever, it might have been minted from a die which was made by then local Indian engraver? This portrait is not of a Prince who was living a lavish life in a palace. It could be a true portrait of a warrior after so many years of war in Afghanistan! That is the reason the fabric of this gold coin is exactly the same like silver coin of Alexander elephant/poros type!

    Professor Osmund Bopearachchi visited Peshawar quite often in early 90s. He was visiting to publish a collection of a local collector of Pakistan. Some of important coins also entered his collection from Mirzakah hoard. The coins were published in the book called Pre-Kushana coins in Pakistan. I think Professor Bopearachchi was the only scholar of the whole world who visited Peshawar and Afghanistan in that critical situation of war and collected most of the data regarding this treasure?

    This is the story of the Mirzakah treasure which I remember. Let us read the new book in the first instance and then make our observation and comments later!

    Best regards
    Mobin Ahmed
    Islamabad, Pakistan.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s