Colchester v. British Museum Brouhaha

A WORLD-famous museum has promised to update its visitor information, after wrongly claiming that no Roman chariot circus had been found in Britain.

Colchester borough and county councillor Kevin Bentley took the British Museum to task after spotting the error during a trip to London with his wife Karen.

The town’s own Circus Maximus was discovered by the Colchester Archaeological Trust in 2004.

Work is now under way to show the circus’s layout, and secure £750,000 for the Sergeants’ Mess and gardens under which lie its eight starting gates.

Mr Bentley wrote to museum director Neil MacGregor requesting not only a correction, but help directing tourists to Colchester, the site of northern Europe’s only known circus.

In response, Dr Ralph Jackson, curator of Romano-British Collections, said: “As you can imagine, we frequently up-date and refresh our galleries, and brief details of Colchester’s circus were added, fairly soon after its discovery, to one of the labels in the most appropriate part of the ‘Roman army’ case, as well as to our website.

“You are quite correct, though, that the follow-up change to the in-case hanging information panel has not yet been made.

“I am grateful to you for drawing our attention to that, and I shall ensure that it is done as soon as possible,” he added.

Mr Bentley, a former cabinet member for culture and tourism, said what little information there was on Colchester’s circus find had been buried away on a small information board, while a larger version claimed no circus had ever been found in Britain.

“I am just delighted that they have recognised that the board needs updating, and, of course, this is a chance to promote Colchester,” he said.

“It is not about getting one over on the British Museum. It is about getting it corrected, and point people towards Colchester. And, of course, it is a chance for people in Colchester to go and see their town mentioned in the British Museum.” […]

via Colchester: British Museum to correct Roman Circus slip-up |Essex County Standard.

Rome’s Birthday Celebrations

In case you happen to be in Rome next week, here’s a list of assorted events which are going on to celebrate the 2763rd anniversary of Romulus and Remus’ little spat:

2.763° Natale di Roma: ecco il programma | Prima Press.

Niggling at Ning?

Folks who are familiar with the Ning social networks — especially the pair which are of most interest to us (eClassics and Schola) — were likely concerned t’other day when the folks in charge of Ning decided they were going to charge for the erstwhile free service, potentially threatening the survival of such networks. Fortunately, Andrew Reinhard mentioned eClassics would continue:

It was announced today that Ning (the host and creator of the platform for creating social networks like eClassics and Schola) will be suspending its free, site-building service, meaning that Ning network creators will need to pay to keep these free sites open and running.

I am writing to let you know that I am committed to keeping eClassics open and free to visitors and members, and will be paying Ning to upgrade to a premium level of service. The site will continue to be free for you to use. With nearly 1,600 international members, many of whom visit at least once per week and who use material here for classes, it’s important to maintain eClassics and to keep it here on Ning.

… as did Evan Milner in regards to Schola:

Ning have just announced on their Developer Network that they are terminating their free service – the cut off date has not yet been given, but this will effectively kill Schola, and this site as well. I will, however, convert Schola to a Premium site, if there is no alternative way to keep it alive on Ning. This at present is $10 a month, the new pricing schedule has not been announced.

I am also currently looking into alternatives as a fail safe, and am making arrangements to have Schola archived, just in case things go pear shaped so that at least what exists of the site will be preserved as a record, if we are unable to migrate the site elsewhere……but as things stand, this looks manageable….my first reaction was one of horror….but on reflection, no reason to panic.

via eLatin eGreek eLearn – More wired than a Roman Internet café.

I’m sure there are folks who will be willing to contribute financially to the ongoing survival of these very useful resources …

Minoans in North America? I hae me doots …

Readers of my Explorator newsletter will recognize the name of Gavin Menzies as the guy who wrote a book suggesting that a Chinese sailor reached North America  before Columbus. While the book was hailed in China (for obvious reasons), it seems to have been generally met with skepticism on this side of the Pacific … now Menzies is working on another book — this time suggesting that the Minoans (!) made it here even earlier than that! Some excerpts (and a tip o’ the pileus to Francesca Tronchin for alerting us to this one):

[…] As he did back then, Mr. Menzies remains unwavering from his beliefs. He claims his latest evidence for his book, which doesn’t have a publishing date or a title yet, solves the mystery of which ancient civilization mined thousands of copper mines around Lake Superior on the Canadian-American border as early as 2,200 B.C., leaving behind thousands of knives, harpoons and other objects.

Vessels depicted in Minoan frescoes and the remains of one of them — the Uluburun wreck found on the Mediterranean seabed in 1982 with a cargo of copper ingots and artifacts from seven different civilizations — have convinced him that their ships were advanced enough for ocean travel. The frescoes and the wreck’s surviving fragments, he claims, gave him enough detail to work out the number of rowers, the type and efficiency of sails and the sailing capacity.

“We can make accurate estimates of the length, width and draught of the ships and hence their seagoing capability,” he explains in a phone interview from his home in central London, sounding resolute. “The ships could sail into the wind as well as before it, and lower sail very quickly in the event of an unexpected squall.”

He also claims to have DNA proof that the Minoans carried a rare gene found today among Native Americans around Lake Superior and scientific tests matching the region’s “uniquely pure” copper to the Uluburun ingots. Pointing to evidence of indigenous American plants being transported to other civilizations — including nicotine traces found in ancient Egyptian mummies and maize-cobs carved on their temples — he says that the Egyptians with their flimsy vessels weren’t great seafarers and that only the Minoans, with whom they traded, could have undertaken trans-Atlantic travel.

One would expect that if the Minoans carried tobacco from the Americas to Egypt, evidence of American tobacco should exist around Crete. “There is such evidence in the form of a tobacco beetle found buried beneath the 1450 B.C. volcanic ash of a merchant’s house in Akrotiri, the Minoan town…This tobacco beetle, Lasioderma Serricorne, was indigenous to the Americas. It should be remembered tobacco didn’t grow in Europe in 1450 B.C.,” Mr. Menzies says.

Despite his confidence, Mr. Menzies is bracing himself for ill-winds and a storm over his new theories. Although he has yet to finish his Minoan book, some academics are again skeptical ahead of having a chance to read the evidence.

Although Professor Carl Johannessen, professor emeritus at the University of Oregon and co-author of “World Trade and Biological Exchanges before 1492,” is intrigued by Mr. Menzies’s latest research and applauds his previous efforts as “a powerful search for ancient knowledge,” he says, “I am convinced that the Minoans were not the first or the only sailors crossing the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.”

Meanwhile, Susan Martin, an associate professor of archaeology at Michigan State University who specializes in Lake Superior’s prehistoric archaeology, says, “There is no evidence of any exploration or exploitation of the mineral resources by anyone other than Native American users.”

Professor John Bennet, a Minoan expert at the University of Sheffield, argues that, while it is theoretically possible that Minoans reached America, their ships were too small to carry sufficient supplies and cargo for regular long voyages. And Cemal Pulak, an associate professor at Texas A&M University who led the Uluburun excavation, says that such ambitious seafaring wouldn’t have been feasible. Although the vessels were sturdy, they didn’t have decks to endure storms and rough seas, he explains, adding that the Uluburun copper came from Cyprus.

Undeterred, Mr. Menzies counters that the Minoan ships were three times the size of Columbus’s, that ancient artifacts found at Lake Superior match those from the Uluburun wreck, and that indigenous Americans had no knowledge of mining or smelting copper artifacts. […]

Wow … outside of the obvious squirrel-potential of this one, it is incredibly surprising that the Wall Street Journal is printing what is a review of a book before it is even finished; it’s similarly surprising that Dalya Alberge (the archaeology writer for the Times of London … although I notice she now seems to be with the Guardian?) seems to be penning it. Perhaps Menzies wants to know what he’s going to have to explain away before his tome goes to press. Whatever the case,  folks  might want to prearm themselves and take a look at some of the Old Copper Complex artifacts found in various sites around Lake Superior as depicted on this very nice webpage (scroll down for photos) … just a quick observation on my part: I’m not sure many of the Old Copper Culture artifacts were actually ‘cast’ (as are most of the metal items from Uluburun); particularly noteworthy is a comparison of spearheads … the Old Copper Culture ones seem to be definitely hammered (photo on the aforementioned page) while those on the shipwreck are definitely cast (see the link to a photo near the bottom of this page). There’s a marked difference in quality of ‘attachment’ as well … just for starters.

via Sailing Against Conventional Wisdom – WSJ.com.

Citanda: Christian Zgoll on Role-Play in Ovid

Christian Zgoll, “Crossroads Narrative or Beauty Contest? Role-Play in Ovid, Amores 3.1” 10.97-111

via Digressus, the internet journal for the Classical World.