Citanda: Brett Favre and Achilles

Mentioned this on facebook last week … forgot to post it here. Here’s the incipit:

Even though Homer’s Iliad was written approximately three thousand years ago, the character of Achilles is still alive and well. He is forty one years old, lives in Mississippi, and spends his autumns and winters in Minnesota. Minnesota Vikings quarterback Brett Favre is the modern-day embodiment of the legendary warrior Achilles.

The first and most obvious trait that the two legends share is that both men are primadonnas whose narcissistic tendencies can become a major annoyance and nearly impossible to deal with. In the case of Favre, he did not want to attend the Vikings’ training camp, and so he simply refused to join the Vikings in 2009, saying he would remain retired from the New York Jets. Midway through camp, Favre had an unsurprising change of heart and decided to play again, for the Vikings. After this decision was made, reports swirled that part of the reason Favre was so unwilling to join the Vikings because he did not want to share a room with any of his teammates. This selfishness is a direct parallel of the character of Achilles.

In Book I of the Iliad, the Greek warriors take two Trojan women, Chryseis and Briseis, to be their concubines, and it turns out that the Greeks’ leader Agamemnon chose Chryseis to be his, but she is the daughter of a priest named Chrysus, who summons the help of the gods to get his daughter back. A plague hits the Greek camp, and Agamemnon gives Chryseis back, but insists on taking Briseis, the woman who Achilles had claimed as his own. This infuriates Achilles, who then stays in his tent and refuses to participate in the war. [more …]

Aesop in the Florida Debates?

Aesop seems to be a theme today for some reason … here’s the end of an item from the Huffington Post commenting on the Florida senate elections debates:

Thankfully, a commercial break intervened, but immediately afterwards, moderator Antonio Mora, news anchor for host station WFOR-TV, returned to the theme. That’s when Aesop made his cameo appearance.

“In making your run as an Independent, you changed some of the positions you had held as a Republican in the past. In one of Aesop’s fables, he talked about the bats and the beasts and the birds, and how the beasts and the birds were in a fight, and the bat wouldn’t pick a side. In the end, the moral of the story was that he who is neither one thing or another has no friends. Who are you now?”

Crist replied, “I am the same guy I’ve always been…a fiscal conservative and a social moderate,” then pivoted to attack Rubio for wanting to “overturn Roe v. Wade” and “putting…privatization (of Social Security) on the table….I am running against an extreme right wing candidate who believes in taking away women’s rights, punishing seniors…and that’s just not right.”

This is interesting insofar as bats make an appearance in another fable of Aesop … in the Townsend translation (via N.S. Gill):

A BAT who fell upon the ground and was caught by a Weasel pleaded to be spared his life. The Weasel refused, saying that he was by nature the enemy of all birds. The Bat assured him that he was not a bird, but a mouse, and thus was set free. Shortly afterwards the Bat again fell to the ground and was caught by another Weasel, whom he likewise entreated not to eat him. The Weasel said that he had a special hostility to mice. The Bat assured him that he was not a mouse, but a bat, and thus a second time escaped.

… with the concomitant moral: It is wise to turn circumstances to good account.

Not being all that interested in Florida politics, but wary of politicians in general, I’m not sure which ‘batty story’ would best apply …

CONF: Visions of Leadership in the Ancient World (RIA Colloquium)

Seen on Classicists (please send any responses to the people/institution mentioned in the post, not to rogueclassicism!):

The Royal Irish Academy Committee for Classical and Near Eastern Studies cordially invites you to a colloquium on “Visions of Leadership in the Ancient World”, which will be held on the 4th and 5th of November in the Academy, 19 Dawson Street, Dublin 2.

* Thursday 4 November, 18:00-20:00:

Prof. Amélie Kuhrt (University College London)
Achaemenid Images of Power (followed by reception)

* Friday 5 November, 9:30-17:00:

Dr. Ashley Clements (Trinity College Dublin)
Kings and Customs: Monarchical Rulers and the Rule of Nomos in Herodotus

Dr. Zuleika Rodgers and Dr. Martine Cuypers (Trinity College Dublin)
Theorizing Theocracy: Judaean Priesthood and Kingship

Dr. Alexander Thein (University College Dublin)
Leadership in Late Republican Rome

Dr. Michael Williams (NUI Maynooth)
A Tale of Two Bishops: Doctrine and Leadership in Late Antique Milan

For further information and registration please contact Martine Cuypers at cuypersm AT tcd.ie.

Citanda: Roman Republic Network

This was mentioned on the Classicists list a while ago … here’s a bit from the info page:

The purpose of this website is to exchange knowledge amongst scholars interested in the Roman Republic.

It aims to provide a forum for scholars working in all fields of historical, literary, linguistic or achaeological research involving the Roman Republic (c. 500-27 BC) and the nations surrounding it. A particular focus of the website are the processes of integration and identity formation that took place in this period in Italy and beyond.

The website intends to be the focal point for a network of scholars interested in these issues, and to facilitate contact between them. It will be used for sharing ongoing research, for example by publishing working papers on which you would like to receive feedback, and bibliographies, teaching resources, links, and other information that you think will be of interest to others.
If you would like to contribute, please contact Saskia Roselaar, saskia.roselaar AT manchester.ac.uk

… there’s a few working papers up at the site (among other things) but it seems to have stalled. Perhaps some of rogueclassicism’s readers have something to contribute?

CFP: ‘From the Cradle to the Grave’: Reciprocity & Exchange in Medicine and the Making of the Modern Arts

University of Exeter Logo
Image via Wikipedia

Seen on Classicists (please send any responses to the people/institution mentioned in the post, not to rogueclassicism!):

‘From the Cradle to the Grave’: Reciprocity & Exchange in Medicine and the
Making of the Modern Arts

Date: 14th April 2011, University of Exeter

Conference website:
http://centres.exeter.ac.uk/medhist/conferences/cradle/index.html

Keynote Speakers: Professor Brian Hurwitz (King’s College London) and
Deborah Kirklin MD (University College London & Editor of Medical Humanities)

‘From the Cradle to the Grave’ is an interdisciplinary event designed to
bring together postgraduate students and early career academics working
throughout the humanities, including the fields of English, Modern
Languages, Politics, Film, Classics, Medical History, Drama and Theology.
The conference will focus on the impact of health and medicine in the
‘making and unmaking’ of all modern arts, from the nineteenth century
onwards. Rather than simply examining finished texts, films, artworks or
pieces of theatre/film, the central goal of this conference is to examine
the processes by which medicine and the arts have influenced each other
across time and place and explore the ways in which both fields continue to
intersect.

We will be hosting an art and screen exhibition on the relationship between
hospital art and health using artistic pieces from Devon and Cornwall,
organised in conjunction with Arts and Health South West and Royal Devon and
Exeter Hospital. The conference will also incorporate a plenary discussion
on the nature of ‘Medical Humanities’ and publishing within the field, as
part of Deborah Kirklin’s keynote address.

We encourage papers examining contemporary and historical relationships
between medicine and the arts. Possible themes include but are not limited to:
• Representations of medicine in culture (e.g. music, visual cultures, film,
literature)
and the impact of culture on health/medicine
• Ethical implications of combining medicine and the arts
• Formulating and conceptualising the field of ‘Medical Humanities’
• Theoretical and empirical approaches to studying relationships between
medicine /
Medical History and the arts
• The politics, processes and limitations of exchange between medicine and
the arts
• Practice-based applications of reciprocity, such as promoting health
through the arts

We welcome papers in alternative formats, for example incorporating
performance pieces of music, dance, film or theatre. Writers, texts or
topics need not be canonical and we actively encourage papers discussing
writers, texts, visual media, theories and artefacts from around the world.

Abstracts (350 words for papers of twenty minutes duration) are invited by
21st December 2010. Please email abstracts and enquiries to conference
organisers Sam Goodman (sgg204 AT ex.ac.uk) or Victoria Bates (vlb204 AT ex.ac.uk).

The conference will be free of charge to attend, although we will encourage
delegates to give voluntary charitable donations to Paintings in Hospitals.
A limited number of travel bursaries of up to £50 are also available on
application. If you need a bursary, please express your interest to the
conference organisers when submitting your abstract.